Showing posts with label as discussed in class. Show all posts
Showing posts with label as discussed in class. Show all posts

Friday, April 6, 2007

Beep...Beep...Beep...

Here's a quick recap of what we've done in class this week.

It Just Went Off AgainOh yeah, and this. Whatev.

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Midterm

The midterm exam is Friday, March 9th. We're having a review for the midterm on Wednesday, March 7th.

I hope to see you there.

Thursday, March 1, 2007

Curious George: Curiously Good?

I don't get it. How could Curious George be a good movie?


I'll have to see it to be sure, Ryan, but this video isn't helping your case.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Paper #1 Guidelines

Due Date: Monday, March 5, 2007

Worth: 10% of final grade

Assignment:

Write an argumentative essay on one of the topics below. Papers must be typed, and must be between 800—1200 words long. Provide a word count on the first page of the paper. (Most word processing programs like Microsoft Word & WordPerfect have automatic word counts.)

1) Should we trust our senses? Do our sense experiences accurately represent an external, physical world? First, briefly explain the different answers that the philosophers we’ve read (Descartes, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Kant) give to these questions, as well as their arguments for their answers. Then critically evaluate the answers and arguments that at least two of these philosophers offer. Finally, provide your own answers to these questions. (You can either side with one of the philosophers we’ve read, or provide an original argument of your own.) Ultimately, can we know that there is an external world? Why or why not? Be sure to fully and philosophically defend your answers.

2) Critically evaluate both the theory of pragmatism and the various theories of feminist epistemology we’ve discussed. First, explain each theory. What does each theory is said is required for knowledge? What do they say we can know? What do they say we cannot know? Then, evaluate these theories. Do they accurately describe what you understand knowledge to be? What do they get right? What do they get wrong? Are any of these theories successful accounts of what it means to know something? Be sure to fully and philosophically defend your evaluation.

3) Within the parameters of epistemological debates we’ve discussed in class, write on a topic of your choosing. (Sean must approve your topic by Monday, February 26th.)