Curious George: Curiously Good?

I don't get it. How could Curious George be a good movie?


I'll have to see it to be sure, Ryan, but this video isn't helping your case.

The Antidote for Humeanism

Do you find yourself obsessed with Hume's question of what could justify inductive reasoning? Boy, do I have a link for you:

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: The Problem of Induction

Or, you could watch a dog puppet insult people waiting in line to see Star Wars:

Triumph vs. Star Wars Geeks

Hmmm... is Triumph justified in concluding that all Stars Wars fans are nerds?

Why Trust Our Senses?

We may not have a lot of time to go over this in class, so I thought we could try discussing it on the blog.

Descartes's argument for why we can trust our senses, and as a result have knowledge about the external world, is pretty unconvincing. So what do you think would be a good argument for trusting our senses? What's a good argument that we can and do know stuff about the external world?

In other words, why shouldn't we all be skeptics? (OK, some of you may think we should. If so, this post isn't for you. For all you know, this blog may not even exist. Did I just blow your mind?)

Keanu-Approved Links

Here's a trio of links. The first one's that guide to reading philosophy we talked about in class on Friday.

Jim Pryor's Guide to Reading Philosophy

The next two relate to epistemology and skepticism, which are what we'll be talking about this week. Both are about the movie The Matrix. The first is pretty straightforward (Neo reads it and says 'whoa'), but the second is a little more advanced (Neo reads it and says 'huh?').

The Matrix: Dream Skepticism

The Matrix: Brain-in-a-Vat Skepticism

By the way, if you have any links you think I or others in class might find interesting, let me know.